Story appeared on The New Scientist website at
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99994318
and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute at
http://www.hhmi.org/news/karupiah.html
The New Scientist, October 29, 2003
Title: "US develops lethal new viruses"
Author: Debora MacKenzie
Faculty Evaluator: Lynn Cominsky Ph.D.
Student Researcher: Brian Pederson
Mainstream media coverage:
CBS News, November 1, 2003
CNN News, October 31, 2003
Scientists funded by the US government have developed a way to make
pox viruses incredibly deadly. Ostensibly, this research is being
conducted as part of the plan to fight possible bio-terror attacks.
The new virus kills all mice even if they have been given antiviral
drugs along with a vaccine that would normally protect the victim from
death. Mark Buller of the University of St. Louis has managed to
modify mousepox, rabbitpox, and cowpox viruses so that they are deadly
to vaccinated mice nearly 100% of the time through the introduction of
an immunosuppressant protein called Interleukin-4 (IL-4). The modified
pox viruses eliminate the immune system's cell-mediated response. They
are now immune to the antiviral drug Cidofovir, known to be the last
line of defense in treating resistant viruses.
Scientists at the Australian National University in Canberra made the
original discovery by accident, though their virus only killed off
sixty percent of infected mice. As a side effect of introducing IL-4
into pox viruses, the virus becomes species specific and
non-communicable, though no one is quite sure why this is the case.
The implications of this discovery and their disclosure are
staggering. IL-4 is a protein common in genetic research and as such
is available on the Internet for as low as sixty dollars. Furthermore
the procedure is simple, something that a biology graduate student
should be able to manage without trouble. The bio-terrorist potential
for an IL-4 modified pox virus that infects humans is extraordinary.
Like anthrax, only those who come into contact with the virus itself
would become infected. The virus would not spread and infect the
attackers. Neither would it require state of the art scientific
facilities to create such a virus. Buller and his team are currently
working on a drug to resist the new viruses, but have so far been
unsuccessful in
doe - 07 Sep 2004 04:20 GMT
>Subject: U.S. Develops New Use For Interleukin-4
>From: baby_p_nut2@yahoo.com (Baby Peanut)
[quoted text clipped - 49 lines]
>working on a drug to resist the new viruses, but have so far been
>unsuccessful in
Time to empty the .. lactoferrin .. boys ..
Biometals. 2004 Jun;17(3):295-9. Related Articles, Links
Antiviral activity of lactoferrin towards naked viruses.
Seganti L, Di Biase AM, Marchetti M, Pietrantoni A, Tinari A, Superti F.
Public Health Sciences Department, University La Sapienza, P.le A. Moro 5,
00185 Rome, Italy.
It is well known that lactoferrin (Lf) is a potent inhibitor towards several
enveloped and naked viruses, such as rotavirus, enterovirus and adenovirus. Lf
is resistant to tryptic digestion and breast-fed infants excrete high levels of
faecal Lf, so that its effect on viruses replicating in the gastrointestinal
tract is of great interest. In this report, we analysed the mechanism of the
antiviral action of this protein in three viral models which, despite
representing different genoma and replication strategies, share the ability to
infect the gut. Concerning the mechanism of action against rotavirus, Lf from
bovine milk (BLf) possesses a dual role, preventing virus attachment to
intestinal cells by binding to viral particles, and inhibiting a post
adsorption step. The BLf effect towards poliovirus is due to the interference
with an early infection step but, when the BLf molecule is saturated with Zn+2
ions, it is also capable of inhibiting viral replication after the viral
adsorption phase. The anti-adenovirus action of BLf takes place on virus
attachment to cell membranes through competition for common glycosaminoglycan
receptors and a specific interaction with viral structural polypeptides. Taken
together, these findings provide further evidence that Lf is an excellent
candidate in the search of natural agents against viral enteric diseases, as it
mainly acts by hindering adsorption and internalisation into cells through
specific binding to cell receptors and/or viral particles.
PMID: 15222481 [PubMed - in process]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
Who loves ya.
Tom

Signature
Jesus Was A Vegetarian! http://jesuswasavegetarian.7h.com
Man Is A Herbivore! http://pages.ivillage.com/ironjustice/manisaherbivore
DEAD PEOPLE WALKING http://pages.ivillage.com/ironjustice/deadpeoplewalking
PaulKing - 07 Sep 2004 08:46 GMT
"As a side effect of introducing IL-4
into pox viruses, the virus becomes species specific and
non-communicable"
They have invented 'HIV'.
About time.
http://www.HIVsearch.com - 09 Sep 2004 03:05 GMT
I do not see how that proves HIV is invented (I do not see how that
simple posting proves anything at all in fact), besides, saying it was
invented means you agree that HIV is for REAL Paul! An AIDS dissident
like your self should be more careful Paul King...
I knew we would get you to believe it :)
http://Virus.HIV-AIDS-POZ.com
http://Invented.HIV-AIDS-POZ.com
http://Communicable.HIV-AIDS-POZ.com
http://Side.Effect.HIV-AIDS-POZ.com
Thanks, http://I.Am.Not.Afraid.org/DaveyBoy/ (DaveyBoy)
http://www.HIV-AIDS-POZ.com HIV Art & Campaigns
http://www.HIV-AIDS-Meds.com HIV Drugs
http://www.hivforum.com/blogs/ POZ Bloggers
RJJ - 10 Sep 2004 00:07 GMT
> "As a side effect of introducing IL-4
> into pox viruses, the virus becomes species specific and
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> About time.
The mousepox virus is already mouse specific! Mouse IL-4, although
non functional in humans, is likely to be biologically active in other
closely related rodents and may extend the host-range of the mousepox
virus by suppressing the innate immune response in these species. How
said the GMO IL-4 virus was non-communicable?